<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dezgo.info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dezgo.info</link>
	<description>Stream of randomness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:20:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Diamond oceans cover Uranus (and Neptune)</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=458</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=458#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geeky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamondbergs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neptune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So no one knows for sure, however recently some scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory provided compelling evidence that oceans made of diamond, complete with icebergs (diamondbergs?) may exist in our own solar system. The pressure near the more solid part of Uranus and Neptune is millions of times stronger than our own atmosphere [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a id="aptureLink_Z9ARGgA7GA" style="margin: 0pt auto; text-align: center; display: block; padding: 0px 6px;" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flyingsinger/78309127/"><img style="border: 0px none;" title="Voyager Uranus" src="http://static.flickr.com/38/78309127_fe9fa349e8.jpg" alt="" width="500px" height="460px" /></a>So no one knows for sure, however recently some scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory provided compelling evidence that oceans made of diamond, complete with icebergs (diamondbergs?) may exist in our own solar system. The pressure near the more solid part of <a id="aptureLink_dZB49zpUc8" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranus">Uranus</a> and <a id="aptureLink_hBOkYlr2oS" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neptune%20%28planet%29">Neptune</a> is millions of times stronger than our own atmosphere and the heat is through the roof, so to speak, all of which makes it incredibly difficult to actually observe a diamond ocean.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/diamond-oceans-jupiter-uranus.html" target="_blank">Discovery</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Eggert and his colleagues took a small, natural, clear diamond, about a tenth of a carat by weight and half a millimeter thick, and blasted it with lasers at ultrahigh pressures like those found on gas giants like Neptune and Uranus.</em></p>
<p><em>The scientists liquefied the diamond at pressures 40 million times greater than what a person feels when standing at sea level on Earth. From there they slowly reduced the temperature and pressure.</em></p>
<p><em>When the pressure dropped to about 11 million times the atmospheric pressure at sea level on Earth and the temperature dropped to about 50,000 degrees, solid chunks of diamond began to appear. The pressure kept dropping, but the temperature of the diamond remained the same, with more and more chunks of diamond forming.<br />
</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/diamond-oceans-jupiter-uranus.html" target="_blank">Diamond Oceans Possible on Uranus, Neptune </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=458</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Youtube to start charging for content. Don&#8217;t panic.</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=447</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=447#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Youtube has announced that it will begin streaming certain movies from the Sundance Film Festival for about 5 bucks. In this case switching to a paid model appears to be a good thing. Youtube is not moving their existing content behind a paywall (who would pay for keyboard cat anyways?), but are enhancing the site [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a id="aptureLink_docxv19uwI" style="float: left; padding: 0px 6px;" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/topgold/3341867340/"><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0px none;" title="Logo of YouTube" src="http://static.flickr.com/3347/3341867340_478f9b8c49.jpg" alt="" width="50%" height="50%" /></a>Youtube has announced that it will begin streaming certain movies from the <a id="aptureLink_oVCBlcKZEV" href="http://www.imdb.com/Sections/Awards/Sundance_Film_Festival">Sundance Film Festival</a> for about 5 bucks. In this case switching to a paid model appears to be a good thing. Youtube is not moving their existing content behind a paywall (who would pay for <a id="aptureLink_uau23gsCjy" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Th2QoHd2o">keyboard cat</a> anyways?), but are enhancing the site with more content.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://" target="_blank">ReadWriteWeb</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Five Sundance films have been selected for this venture. It&#8217;s what we&#8217;d consider a test run to see how users will respond to paid content on the site, and whether this could be a new revenue stream for the web video giant, which has historically struggled with profitability.</em></p>
<p><em>The films include The Cove, an underwater adventure about dolphin capturing in Japan; Bass Ackwards, which chronicles an improvised road trip; Children of Invention, about two Bostonian orphans; One Too Many Mornings, a &#8220;coming of age comedy about two guys who are too old to be coming of age&#8221;; and Homewrecker, a comedy about a locksmith. The filmmakers will determine the exact asking price for viewing each movie, but all will be in the range of $5.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/youtube_will_start_charging_for_some_videos.php" target="_blank">YouTube Will Start Charging for Some Videos</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=447</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hulu unveils possible subscription model.</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=443</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=443#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While nothing is set in stone, Hulu is considering charging for older episodes of popular TV shows. Hulu would allow viewers to watch the 5 most recent episodes and charging $4.99 a month to access back episodes. From the LA Times: The site has spent months studying how to strike a balance between what people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-newhulu21-2010jan21,0,1871796.story"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-152" title="Broke TV" src="http://dezgo.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Broke-TV-300x193.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="193" /></a>While nothing is set in stone, Hulu is considering charging for older episodes of popular TV shows. Hulu would allow viewers to watch the 5 most recent episodes and charging $4.99 a month to access back episodes.</p>
<p>From the<a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-newhulu21-2010jan21,0,1871796.story" target="_blank"> LA Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The site has spent months studying how to strike a balance between what people expect to watch free online and what they would be willing to pay for, said people familiar with the matter who were not authorized to speak publicly.</em></p>
<p><em>One plan being considered would allow users to view the five most recent episodes of TV shows free but would require a subscription of $4.99 a month to watch older episodes. Hulu believes it will need at least 20 TV series &#8212; both current ones and those no longer on the air &#8212; to make such a pay service attractive to users. A firm pricing model could emerge within six months, the sources said.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-newhulu21-2010jan21,0,1871796.story" target="_blank">At Hulu, &#8216;free&#8217; may soon turn into &#8216;fee&#8217;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dezgo.info/?p=282" target="_self">Hulu will not become pay for play. Sorta</a></p>
<p><a href="http://dezgo.info/?p=149" target="_self">Hulu to become paysite in 2010?</a></p>
<p>Image courtesy <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinsteele/24771587/" target="_blank">Flickr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=443</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The soviets tame the fox. Circa 1950</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=437</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=437#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geeky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the 1950&#8242;s the then Soviet Union embarked on an ambitious project. No not the space race or the arms race of the cold war era, but on a noble quest to domesticate the silver fox. The Russian scientists selectively bred for tameness by measuring how close a wild fox would allow a human [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-439" title="Domestic Fox" src="http://dezgo.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Domestic-Fox.jpg" alt="" width="207" height="154" />Back in the 1950&#8242;s the then Soviet Union embarked on an ambitious project. No not the space race or the arms race of the cold war era, but on a noble quest to domesticate the silver fox. The Russian scientists selectively bred for tameness by measuring how close a wild fox would allow a human to approach. Only the tamest made it into the next generation, no biters. Surprisingly under strong selection, the desired traits began to appear quickly.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/book_extracts/article6808173.ece?" target="_blank">Times Online (UK)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>After a mere six generations of this selective breeding for tameness, the foxes had changed so much that the experimenters felt obliged to name a new category, the “domesticated elite” class, which were “eager to establish human contact, whimpering to attract attention and sniffing and licking experimenters like dogs”. At the beginning of the experiment, none of the foxes were in the elite class. After ten generations of breeding for tameness, 18 per cent were “elite”; after 20 generations, 35 per cent; and after 30 to 35 generations, “domesticated elite” individuals constituted between 70 and 80 per cent of the experimental population. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Not only did the foxes change behaviorally, physiological changes similar to domesticated dogs began to appear.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesticated_silver_fox" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The domesticated foxes exhibit both behavioral and physiological changes from their wild forebears. They are friendlier with humans, put their ears down (like dogs), wag their tails when happy, and have begun to vocalize and bark like domesticated dogs. They have also developed color patterns like domesticated dogs and have lost their distinctive musky &#8216;fox smell&#8217;.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>More recently, a microarray analysis has shown that only a handful of genes expressed in the brain are altered by behavioral selection. Small genetic changes can have a large effect.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6VRT-4HM7R39-9&amp;_user=10&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;_docanchor=&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=96a048f0218508322e67cdef0740ca0d" target="_blank">ScienceDirect</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The widespread changes seen in the farmed foxes following selection for tameness have been interpreted as a model of what may have taken place during the domestication process for other mammals [4 L.N. Trut, I.Z. Pliusnina and I.N. Os’kina, An experiment on fox domestication and debatable issues of evolution of the dog, Genetika 40 (2004), pp. 794–807. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (7)4]. Our results suggest that the striking and widespread differences between NS and S animals are accompanied by limited amount of gene expression divergence compared to that between wild and farmed animals. As the S line had been founded by a small number of individuals, founder effects might have increased the differentiation between NS and S foxes; if this were the case, however, the real effect of behavioural selection would be even smaller than that reported here. As the NS and S foxes lived in identical environments, the observed differences most probably reflect the consequences of behavioural selection, with perhaps some contribution from founder effects, whereas the differences between farm and wild animals are likely to derive from both genetic (adaptation to captivity) and environmental differences. These combined results suggest that the dramatic behavioural and physiological changes caused by selection for tameness may be associated with only limited changes in the brain transcriptome. This contrasts with studies with Drosophila melanogaster [10] which have shown that selection for behavioural traits can result in much larger transcriptome changes. Further research will help to elucidate to what extent the observed expression divergence causes tameness in the foxes, or whether it reflects down-stream alterations produced by adaptive changes to the life with humans.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/book_extracts/article6808173.ece?" target="_blank">Richard Dawkins: the truth dogs reveal about evolution</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesticated_silver_fox" target="_blank">Domesticated silver fox</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6VRT-4HM7R39-9&amp;_user=10&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;_docanchor=&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=96a048f0218508322e67cdef0740ca0d" target="_blank">Selection for tameness has changed brain gene expression in silver foxes</a><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/enrLSfxTqZ0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/enrLSfxTqZ0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oDb27ZP9zEE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oDb27ZP9zEE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Image courtesy <a href="http://sibfox.com/" target="_blank">SibFox.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=437</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5,900 Pot plants OK. Electrical violation? Take the kids. Only in California</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=433</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=433#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A San Francisco couple who were caught with 5,900 marijuana plant are now awaiting trial and have lost custody of their three children. The reason for losing the kids was not the ridiculous number of pot plants nor was it enlisting the children&#8217;s help in the harvest. No, it was the illegal and potentially dangerous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.sfweekly.com/shookdown/2010/01/how_much_pot_is_enough_to_get.php"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-434" title="Marijuana Sign" src="http://dezgo.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Marijuana-Sign-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a>A San Francisco couple who were caught with 5,900 marijuana plant are now awaiting trial and have lost custody of their three children. The reason for losing the kids was not the ridiculous number of pot plants nor was it enlisting the children&#8217;s help in the harvest. No, it was the illegal and potentially dangerous wiring required to power the operation without notice by the electric company.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://blogs.sfweekly.com/shookdown/2010/01/how_much_pot_is_enough_to_get.php" target="_blank">SFWeekly</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Because, you see, the Rahois did what most illicit pot growers do: they jumped their home&#8217;s utility box in order to both hide the egregious amount of energy a pot grow requires and to steal some extra juice from the power lines outside. All that extra voltage on wires not designed to handle it creates a fire hazard, and having kids in a fire hazard is, well, against the law.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;If someone is letting their children reside in an unsafe home, whether or not marijuana is involved, that&#8217;s a crime,&#8221; police spokesman Officer Boaz Marales told SF Weekly. Had the box not been jumped, the endangerment charge wouldn&#8217;t have been included, and if the Rahois had recommendations, &#8220;no arrests would have been made,&#8221; he added.<br />
</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blogs.sfweekly.com/shookdown/2010/01/how_much_pot_is_enough_to_get.php" target="_blank">How Much Pot Is Enough (To Get Your Kids Taken Away From You)?</a> via <a href="http://digg.com/people/How_Much_Pot_is_Enough_to_Get_Your_Kids_Taken_Away_From_You" target="_blank">Digg</a></p>
<p>Image courtesy <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/caveman_92223/3410000930/" target="_blank">Flickr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=433</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We can&#8217;t get any fatter. US obesity rate hits plateau</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=429</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=429#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plateau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US obesity rate skyrocketed in the 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s after remaining stable since 1960. Americans&#8217; waistlines increased as the obesity rate shot up from around 15% to over 30%. Apparently, America can only fit so many deep fried, sugar glazed snacks in its collective mouth at once. The last ten years has seen the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/weightloss/2010-01-13-obesity-rates_N.htm"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-430" title="fat man" src="http://dezgo.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/fat-man-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>The US obesity rate skyrocketed in the 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s after remaining stable since 1960. Americans&#8217; waistlines increased as the obesity rate shot up from around 15% to over 30%. Apparently, America can only fit so many deep fried, sugar glazed snacks in its collective mouth at once. The last ten years has seen the obesity rate finally leveling off.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/weightloss/2010-01-13-obesity-rates_N.htm" target="_blank">USA Today</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Donna Ryan, president of the Obesity Society, a group of weight-loss researchers and professionals, says she believes it may have plateaued for now, but &#8220;to level off at 34% obesity is no great achievement. It&#8217;s still very, very alarming. And the high rates of childhood obesity are likely to translate into higher rates of extreme obesity when those children reach adulthood.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>Extra weight increases the risk of diabetes, heart disease, some types of cancer and other health problems. Americans who are obese cost the country an estimated $147 billion in weight-related medical bills in 2008.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/weightloss/2010-01-13-obesity-rates_N.htm" target="_blank">U.S. obesity rate leveling off, at about one-third of adults</a></p>
<p>Image courtesy <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/78428166@N00/3872155588/" target="_blank">Flickr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=429</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SF&#8217;s disappearing sea lions scared, confused, just want to go home.</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=420</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=420#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pier 39]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the last week of November &#8217;09, San Francisco&#8217;s famous sea lions mysteriously disappeared. These large blubbery animals have been mooching off San Francisco for about 20 years. Its not like the free ride was over, scores of people still came to see them daily, food was plentiful and the weather is far from extreme [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-12-16/news/how-hyde-street-pier-eliminated-its-sea-lion-problem/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-421" title="pier-39" src="http://dezgo.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pier-39-300x139.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="139" /></a>During the last week of November &#8217;09, San Francisco&#8217;s famous sea lions mysteriously disappeared. These large blubbery animals have been mooching off San Francisco for about 20 years. Its not like the free ride was over, scores of people still came to see them daily, food was plentiful and the weather is far from extreme in the bay.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/disappearing-sea-lions/" target="_blank">Wired</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>“We have no idea where they moved on to or why,” said Shelbi Stoudt, who manages a team that helps stranded animals in the San Francisco Bay from the Marine Mammal Center in Sausalito, California.</em></p>
<p><em>The sea lions’ disappearance is as strange as their initial colonization of the pier about 20 years ago, in late 1989. They just started showing up one day and as their numbers increased, their traditional hang out, Seal Rocks, became less populated. There are all sorts of theories about why the pier became a favorite haul-out spot for the sea lions, but no one knows for sure why the animals’ behavior changed.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Fast forward a few weeks and it looks like Ashley Harrell from SF Weekly found the missing puzzle piece. Who knew sea lions were such scaredy-cats?</p>
<div id="attachment_422" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 260px"><a href="http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-12-16/news/how-hyde-street-pier-eliminated-its-sea-lion-problem/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-422 " title="Ferocious Dog" src="http://dezgo.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Ferocious-Dog-250x300.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Not the sea lion chasing dog, but terrifying all the same. </p></div>
<p>From <a href="http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-12-16/news/how-hyde-street-pier-eliminated-its-sea-lion-problem/" target="_blank">SFWeekly</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;He runs in their direction, barking,&#8221; says itinerant fisherman Daniel K. of his dog, a golden retriever–pit bull mix called Rez. &#8220;He&#8217;s a lot faster than they are on land. That&#8217;s what gets &#8216;em.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>When Daniel K. showed up at the Hyde Street Pier for crab season in early November, he found it covered in sea lions. Although he had heard about the problems with pinniped infestations up and down the West Coast, &#8220;San Francisco is the worst I&#8217;ve seen,&#8221; he says. He never imagined his dog might be a solution. When he got Rez a year ago, the dog was unfazed by sea lions. But on a recent fishing trip, Rez developed an aversion after several aggressive sea lions charged the boat: &#8220;It freaked him out. After that, he would bark at them.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-12-16/news/how-hyde-street-pier-eliminated-its-sea-lion-problem/" target="_blank">How Hyde Street Pier eliminated its sea lion problem</a><br />
<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/disappearing-sea-lions/" target="_blank">Famous San Francisco Sea Lions Abandon Their Pier 39 Post</a><br />
Image of Pier 39 courtesy <a href="http://twitter.com/GarySoup" target="_blank">Gary Soup</a><br />
Image of Dog Courtesy of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/27238007@N00/3879485619" target="_blank">Flickr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=420</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Unemployed States of America. Infographic &#8211; Business Pundit</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=417</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=417#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look at how GDP as risen steadily since 1980 but income per capita has barely risen. Where is all that money going? Source: Business Pundit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at how GDP as risen steadily since 1980 but income per capita has barely risen. Where is all that money going?<br />
<a title="The Unemployed States of America" href="http://www.businesspundit.com/the-unemployed-states-of-america/"><img src="http://www.businesspundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/unemployment_infographic-thm.jpg" border="0" alt="The Unemployed States of America" /></a></p>
<p><small>Source: <a href="http://www.businesspundit.com">Business Pundit</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=417</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First plant animal hybrid discovered, no mad scientists required.</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=410</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=410#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planimal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Slug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The green sea slug, Elysia chlorotica, has been known to feed on algae and reuse the chloroplasts for its own malevolent intent. Now scientists have presented preliminary evidence that this slug has actually incorporated a whole biochemical pathway into its genome to produce chlorophyll. Once the chlorotica has fed on algae its able to go [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/green-sea-slug/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-411" title="sea slug" src="http://dezgo.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/sea-slug-286x300.gif" alt="" width="286" height="300" /></a>The green sea slug, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysia_chlorotica" target="_blank"><em>Elysia chlorotica</em></a>, has been known to feed on algae and reuse the chloroplasts for its own malevolent intent. Now scientists have presented preliminary evidence that this slug has actually incorporated a whole biochemical pathway into its genome to produce chlorophyll. Once the chlorotica has fed on algae its able to go without food, as long as the sun shines.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/green-sea-slug/" target="_blank">Wired</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Shaped like a leaf itself, the slug Elysia chlorotica already has a reputation for kidnapping the photosynthesizing organelles and some genes from algae. Now it turns out that the slug has acquired enough stolen goods to make an entire plant chemical-making pathway work inside an animal body, says Sidney K. Pierce of the University of South Florida in Tampa.</em></p>
<p><em>The slugs can manufacture the most common form of chlorophyll, the green pigment in plants that captures energy from sunlight, Pierce reported January 7 at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. Pierce used a radioactive tracer to show that the slugs were making the pigment, called chlorophyll a, themselves and not simply relying on chlorophyll reserves stolen from the algae the slugs dine on.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/green-sea-slug/" target="_blank">Green Sea Slug Is Part Animal, Part Plant</a><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aQR_aaUqMPc&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aQR_aaUqMPc&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Image courtesy <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/105/46.cover-expansion" target="_blank">PNAS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=410</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama admin solves pressing crisis: SOTU will not coincide with Lost</title>
		<link>http://dezgo.info/?p=407</link>
		<comments>http://dezgo.info/?p=407#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geeky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dezgo.info/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a brilliant move, showing decisive leadership, the Obama administration has confirmed that the State of the Union (SOTU)  will not coincide with the Lost premier on February 2nd. Previously, the administration had been mulling either a Jan 26th or a Feb 2nd date for the SOTU address. From Huffington Post: But the press secretary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/08/gibbs-state-of-the-union_n_416538.html"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-402" title="Lost-final-season" src="http://dezgo.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Lost-final-season-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>In a brilliant move, showing decisive leadership, the Obama administration has confirmed that the State of the Union (SOTU)  will not coincide with the Lost premier on February 2nd. Previously, the administration had been mulling either a Jan 26th or a Feb 2nd date for the SOTU address.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/08/gibbs-state-of-the-union_n_416538.html" target="_blank">Huffington Post</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>But the press secretary did rule out one possible SOTU date &#8212; much to the delight of a major television network. The speech, Gibbs said, would not take place on the same night as the three-hour premiere of the final season of ABC&#8217;s &#8220;Lost&#8221;.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;I don&#8217;t foresee a scenario in which millions people who hope to finally get some conclusion with &#8216;Lost&#8217; are preempted by the president,&#8221; he said. &#8220;You can quote a senior administration official.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/08/gibbs-state-of-the-union_n_416538.html" target="_blank">Gibbs: State Of The Union Won&#8217;t Coincide With Premiere Of &#8216;Lost&#8217;</a><br />
<a href="http://dezgo.info/?p=401" target="_self">State of the Union vs Lost. February 2nd Showdown</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dezgo.info/?feed=rss2&amp;p=407</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
